DeFi TVL Slides to $70.33 Billion as Aave Votes to Cut Buybacks

The total value locked in decentralised finance has fallen to $70.33 billion, according to DefiLlama data for November 15, 2026, as the sector’s largest lending protocol, Aave, faces a vote on cutting its token buyback budget. In short, DeFi TVL slides $70 billion, a round-number threshold that captures how far the sector has retreated from its recent highs. The decline is not confined to one protocol or one chain. Aave and Uniswap, the two best-known names in decentralised finance, have both lost more than a tenth of their locked value in a week, and the pressure is visible across the lending and trading protocols that sit at the heart of the sector.

DefiLlama put total DeFi TVL at $70.33 billion on November 15, with stablecoins across the sector at $284.879 billion and 24-hour decentralised exchange volume at $8.464 billion. Those figures describe real usage: the value users have deposited, the stablecoins circulating as the sector’s cash, and the volume flowing through its exchanges.

At the centre of the story is Aave, the lending protocol that holds more value than any other DeFi application. Its token has fallen sharply over the past month, its locked value has fallen with it, and its community is now voting on whether to cut the budget it spends buying back its own token. This article sets out the latest figures, explains what they mean, and looks at what the buyback vote signals for Aave and for DeFi as a whole.

DeFi TVL slides $70 billion: the headline numbers

Total value locked, universally known as TVL, is the standard measure of the size of decentralised finance. It adds up the value of all the crypto assets that users have deposited in DeFi protocols, from lending platforms and decentralised exchanges to yield products and derivatives. DefiLlama, the most widely cited source for the figure, put total DeFi TVL at $70.33 billion on November 15. That is the headline number for the sector, and it is the figure against which the health of DeFi is most often judged.

Two supporting figures help to put the TVL number in context. Stablecoins, the dollar-pegged tokens that serve as the cash of the crypto economy, stood at $284.879 billion across DeFi, according to the same DefiLlama data. Meanwhile, 24-hour decentralised exchange volume was $8.464 billion, a measure of how much trading is still flowing through DeFi exchanges on a daily basis.

Aave TVL falls 13 percent in a week

Aave is the largest single protocol in DeFi, and its figures illustrate the pullback more sharply than the sector average. DefiLlama reported Aave’s TVL at $14.749 billion on November 15, spread across 23 chains, with a fall of 4.62 percent in 24 hours, a fall of 12.98 percent over seven days, and a fall of 18.46 percent over 30 days. In plain terms, Aave TVL falls 13 percent in a week on DefiLlama’s figures, and it has lost almost a fifth of its locked value in a month. Those are steep declines for the protocol that is supposed to be the most stable and established name in decentralised lending.

The token has fallen faster than the locked value. CryptoCompass reported on November 14 that AAVE had fallen approximately 29.7 percent over the four weeks ending November 14, underperforming Bitcoin, which fell 17.5 percent over the same period, and Ether, which fell 21.7 percent. That gap matters, because it shows that Aave’s token has been hit harder than the wider market, not merely carried down by it. Over the same four-week period, Aave’s TVL fell 13.5 percent, from $17.95 billion on October 17 to $15.53 billion on November 14, according to a Phemex market report cited by CryptoCompass. That TVL figure is a reported point-in-time estimate, and its methodology was not specified, so it should be read as an indicative estimate rather than a precise audited total.

The Phemex-reported TVL of $15.53 billion on November 14 differs slightly from DefiLlama’s $14.749 billion on November 15 because the sources use different dates and methods, but both point the same way: Aave’s locked value has fallen sharply over the past month, while its token has fallen by almost a third.

Uniswap and the wider slide across chains

Aave is not alone. Uniswap, the largest decentralised exchange, reported a TVL of $3.089 billion across 51 chains on November 15, according to DefiLlama, with a fall of 5.69 percent in 24 hours, a fall of 13.63 percent over seven days, and a fall of 21.19 percent over 30 days. That is a larger proportional decline than Aave’s over the same periods, and it shows that the pressure is hitting trading as well as lending. When exchange volumes and locked liquidity fall together, it suggests that traders are pulling back from the market rather than simply moving between protocols.

The chain-level data shows the same pattern in different corners of the ecosystem. Avalanche, for example, had a TVL of $554.53 million on November 14, down 7.96 percent in 24 hours, and $540.92 million on November 15, according to DefiLlama chain data. Monad, a newer chain that has attracted attention this year, had a TVL of $915.36 million, with stablecoins of $642.69 million and 24-hour decentralised exchange volume of $31.88 million.

The Aave buyback budget cut and what it signals

The most consequential development for Aave may not be the TVL figures themselves but the governance vote now under way. DeFi analyst @DefiIgnas noted that the Aave DAO is voting to cut its AAVE buyback budget from $50 million to $30 million per year, with protocol revenue down 25 percent from its peak and the 2026 budget running a deficit. The Aave buyback budget cut, if approved, would reduce the amount the protocol spends buying its own token on the open market by $20 million a year, a substantial reduction in a programme that many holders regard as a form of support for the token price.

Buybacks work by using protocol revenue to purchase the protocol’s own token, which can support the price and return value to holders. When revenue falls, the money available for buybacks falls with it, and a DAO faces a choice: keep spending at the old rate and run a larger deficit, or cut the budget to match the new reality. The vote to cut from $50 million to $30 million suggests that the Aave community is choosing the second option, accepting a smaller buyback programme in order to protect the protocol’s finances. That is a prudent decision in one sense, and a disappointing signal in another, since it tells the market that the protocol expects revenue to stay below its peak.

What TVL does and does not tell you

TVL is a useful measure, but it is often misunderstood, and the current slide is a good moment to explain what it does and does not show. TVL measures the dollar value of assets deposited in a protocol, so it falls for two different reasons: because the price of the deposited assets has fallen, or because users have withdrawn their assets. A protocol can lose TVL without losing a single user if the tokens it holds fall in price, and it can gain TVL without gaining a single user if prices rise. The figure therefore mixes market prices with user behaviour, and it should never be read as a pure count of users or activity.

That distinction explains why a token can fall faster than the TVL of its own protocol. AAVE fell approximately 29.7 percent over four weeks while Aave’s TVL fell 13.5 percent over the same period, according to the figures cited above. The token is a single asset whose price reflects expectations about the protocol’s future, its revenue, and its governance, while TVL is a basket of many different deposited assets whose prices have fallen by different amounts. The token can also fall because holders are selling in anticipation of the buyback cut, while depositors may be slower to withdraw their funds from a lending protocol they still use. The two numbers measure different things, and they will rarely move in lockstep.

There is also a governance story beyond Aave: Cosmos Hub Governance Proposal #1061 passed quorum with near-unanimous validator support, requiring an upgrade to Gaia v29.1.0 at block 33,935,300 to restore broken governance query functionality. For readers of DeFi, the lesson is to look past the headline TVL number and ask what is driving it: prices, withdrawals, revenue, or governance choices.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the total DeFi TVL right now? DefiLlama put total DeFi TVL at $70.33 billion on November 15, with stablecoins at $284.879 billion and 24-hour decentralised exchange volume at $8.464 billion.

How much has Aave’s TVL fallen? DefiLlama reported Aave TVL at $14.749 billion, down 4.62 percent in 24 hours, 12.98 percent over seven days, and 18.46 percent over 30 days.

Why is Aave cutting its buyback budget? The Aave DAO is voting to cut the AAVE buyback budget from $50 million to $30 million per year, with protocol revenue down 25 percent from its peak and the 2026 budget running a deficit.

Why did the AAVE token fall more than Aave’s TVL? AAVE fell about 29.7 percent in four weeks while TVL fell 13.5 percent, because the token price reflects expectations about revenue and governance, while TVL is a basket of deposited assets that move at different rates.

Is the DeFi decline limited to Aave? No, Uniswap TVL fell 21.19 percent over 30 days to $3.089 billion, and chains such as Avalanche also fell, showing a sector-wide contraction rather than a single-protocol problem.

Source: DefiLlama

Related reading on MM Crypto Analysis Web

• Uniswap v4 Launches 10 xStocks Tokenized Equity Markets on Monad
• AAVE Slides 30% in Four Weeks as LlamaRisk Proposes $1.33 Billion Collateral Wind-Down
• Tokenized Stocks OKX ICE Launch November 23 as Kraken xStocks Adds 200+ UK and EU Shares

More in DeFi on MM Crypto Analysis Web.